Ores, slag and ash
Part of: V — Mineral products
H306409 · 2019-12-30 — Tariff classification of a spent catalyst
This ruling is in response to your letter, dated October 10, 2019, requesting a binding ruling on the tariff classification of a spent catalyst under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Your request was forwarded by the National Commodity Specialist Division to this office for a response. FACTS: The instant product is identified as a spent hydrotreating catalyst. Prior to use, the catalyst begins as a NiMo alumina supported catalyst, consisting of a support of aluminum oxide impregnated with molybdenum and nickel compounds. The original catalyst is then used to drive…
H230127 · 2016-03-08 — Internal Advice; Classification of Tungsten Concentrates
The following is in response to your memorandum, dated May 21, 2012, requesting Internal Advice in accordance with 19 CFR 177.11 (b)(4), concerning the proper classification of tungsten concentrates, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) initiated by letter, dated July 15, 2011, by Hogan Lovells, LLP, on behalf of its client, Global Tungsten & Powders Corporation (“GTP”). FACTS: The merchandise at issue consists of tungsten concentrates entered between August 1, 2008 and September 30, 2013. Certain samples were sent to the Customs and Border Protection (CBP)…
H250634 · 2015-05-04 — Internal Advice Request; Tariff Classification – Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC
At issue, among other things, is the tariff classification for materials resulting from the production of stainless steel in a Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) Subzone owned and operated by Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC (Outokumpu). This Internal Advice also requested assistance on the acceptability of the methods of entered value determination for those materials. The instant response will only address the classification component. The other issues will be addressed under separate cover, Headquarters Ruling (HQ) H249192. A sample of the stainless steel slab at issue here was provided by Outokumpu to…
967661 · 2006-03-31 — Revocation of New York Ruling Letter (NY) R01069, dated December 8,2004; Classification of antimony trisulphide.
, on December 8, 2004, concerning the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) of antimony trisulphide. The antimony trisulphide was classified in subheading 2830.90.0000, HTSUS, which provides for “Sulfides; polysulfides, whether or not chemically defined: Other.’’ You assert that because the merchandise at issue is antimony ore it is classified in subheading 2617.10.0000, HTSUS, which provides for ‘‘Other ores and concentrates: Antimony ores and concentrates.’’ CBP has reviewed the classification of this item and has determined that the cited ruling…
Not sure this code fits your product? HaiLang AI determines the US HTS code from a description in about a minute.
Classify a product