Other: — Other:
Part of: 2932 — Heterocyclic compounds with oxygen hetero-atom(s) only:
H240719 · 2016-09-09 — Protest and Application for Further Review No. 2704-12-102569; Classification of Silymarin Powder
The following is our decision regarding the Application for Further Review (AFR) of Protest No. 2704-12-102569, timely filed on July 13, 2012, on behalf of Novel Ingredient Services (“Novel” or “Protestant”). The Protest and corresponding AFR pertain to a decision by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as to the proper classification of silymarin powder under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), as well as CBP’s alleged failure to liquidate four entries of the subject silymarin powder within one year of their respective entry dates. In reaching the below decision,…
H195716 · 2015-02-19 — Tariff classification of certain Leucoselect® and Silymarin products; Protest Number 3001-11-100172
(Indena), against U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) reclassification and subsequent liquidation of two entries at the Service Port of Seattle (the Port) of two Leucoselect® products and three Silymarin products, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). We have also considered nine (9) supplemental submissions, filed on September 6, 2011, September 22, 2011, December 22, 2011, August 16, 2012, September 11, 2012, February 28, 2013, March 26, 2013, May 16, 2013, and February 10, 2014. Furthermore, CBP met with representatives from Indena on December 4, 2012,…
W563169 · 2007-08-31 — Protest AFR No. 3195-04-100142; Polypeptides; 9817.85.01 Prototype Treatment; Additional U.S. Rule of Interpretation 1(b); Actual Use; 19 CFR 10.134; Classification
This is our decision on the application for further review (AFR) of protest no. 3195-04-100142, timely filed against your classification of polypeptides, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Our decision follows a teleconference held on June 8, 2005, between counsel for the protestant, American Peptide Company, Inc. (APC) and members of the staff of the Office of Regulations and Rulings, Tariff Classification and Marking Branch and Valuation and Special Programs Branch. We have granted the protestant’s request for confidentiality for the structural formulas and…
967972 · 2006-03-02 — Modification of NY 814027; the tariff classification of Silymarin (milk thistle) and Leucoanthocyanin
This is in regard to New York Ruling Letter (NY) 814027, dated February 2, 1996, issued to you on behalf of your client, Indena USA Inc. (Indena), regarding the classification of silymarin (identified as “Milk thistle (Silybum Marianum)”) and leucoanthocyanin (identified as “Leucoanthocyanins [(grape seed) Vitis Vinifera]”) under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). That ruling held that four products, including silymarin and leucoanthocyanin, were classified in subheading 1302.19.4040, HTSUS, the provision for "Vegetable saps and extracts; pectic…
967971 · 2006-03-02 — Revocation of HQ 964338: Silymarin 80% (Milk Thistle Standarized Extract)
This is in regard to Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQ) 964338, dated March 28, 2001, concerning the classification of silymarin under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). In that ruling, we issued a decision on Protest 1001-99-103909, in which the silymarin was classified in subheading 3824.90.28, HTSUS, as a preparation of the chemical or allied industries, not elsewhere specified or included. We have reviewed HQ 964338 and have found it to be in error. Therefore, this ruling revokes HQ 964338. Under San Francisco Newspaper Printing Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517, 620…
Not sure this code fits your product? HaiLang AI determines the US HTS code from a description in about a minute.
Classify a product