Of other synthetic fibers:
N272189 · 2016-02-10 — Correction to Ruling Number N270017
This replaces Ruling Number N270017, dated November 23, 2015, which contained a clerical error. The decitex of the yarns was not provided in the previous request. A re-examination of the merchandise leads us to conclude that some of the yarn is classifiable as twine or cordage, not yarn. A complete, corrected ruling follows: In your letter dated October 19, 2015, you requested a tariff classification ruling. You submitted four yarn samples. The yarns will be imported on skeins of a weight not exceeding 500 grams, which meets the tariff definition of “put up for retail sale” found in Section…
N216362 · 2012-05-23 — The tariff classification of yarns from Italy and Turkey
You submitted six hanks of yarn. Style 135, Hometown USA, Pittsburgh Yellow, is a four-ply twisted yarn of 100% acrylic. The hank weighs 142 grams and contains 74 meters of yarn, with a resulting decitex of approximately 19,000. Note 3(A) (b) to Section XI, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), states that yarns of manmade fibers measuring greater than 10,000 decitex are classified as cordage in heading 5607, HTSUS. The applicable subheading for Style 135, Hometown USA, Pittsburgh Yellow, will be 5607.50.3500, HTSUS, which provides for twine, cordage, rope, and cable; of…
N175358 · 2011-08-04 — The tariff classification of braided cord from China
You submitted a piece of braided cord. In a telephone conversation with this office you identified the sample as item number 145200001. The fiber content is listed as 100% polyester. You describe it as a gimped cord. However, gimped yarn is defined, for tariff purposes, as being composed of a core, usually one or more textile yarns, around which other yarn or yarns are wound spirally. While this cord has a core of numerous plies, the covering yarns are not wound spirally around them. Instead, the core is sheathed with a braided yarn. A tightly braided or plaited yarn such as this is…
966892 · 2004-01-26 — Non-Sterile Suture; HQ 966676 modified
This is in reference to your letter of July 24, 2003, on behalf of Tyco Healthcare Group LP, to the National Commodity Specialist Division, requesting a ruling on the classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), of non-sterile sutures without needles. Your letter was forwarded to this office for reply. We have also considered the claims put forward by you in the telephone conference of November 17, 2003. In response to your letter, we issued Headquarters Ruling (HQ) 966676, dated December 1, 2003. That ruling, however, failed to address the classification…
966676 · 2003-12-01 — Non-Sterile Suture
This is in reference to your letter of July 24, 2003, on behalf of Tyco Healthcare Group LP, to the National Commodity Specialist Division, requesting a ruling on the classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), of non-sterile sutures without needles. Your letter was forwarded to this office for reply. We have also considered the claims put forward by you in the telephone conference of November 17, 2003. FACTS: The subject merchandise consists of the following material assembled into surgical sutures in the Dominican Republic: (1) gut suture sourced from…
Not sure this code fits your product? HaiLang AI determines the US HTS code from a description in about a minute.
Classify a product