Other footwear: — Other:
H260547 · 2015-07-17 — Modification of N252090; Classification of women’s footwear.
In NY N252090, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) responded to a request for tariff classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) of six styles of women’s footwear from China. One of those footwear styles, identified as style 9XX20002 W. Lukla Pro, was classified in NY N252090 in subheading 6402.99.90, HTSUS, which provides for “Other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: Other footwear: Other: Other: Other: Other: Valued over $12/pair.” NCSD submitted a sample of the subject merchandise to the CBP Laboratories and Scientific…
H050119 · 2012-12-10 — Modification of New York Ruling N039198, dated October 23, 2008; Revocation of New York Ruling N039199, dated October 23, 2008; Classification of Work Footwear.
The merchandise in these rulings were classified under subheadings 6403.99.6075 and 6403.99.9065, HTSUSA. We have reviewed NY N039198 and NY N039199 and determined that they are incorrect. Pursuant to section 625(c)(1), Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1625(c)(1)), as amended by section 623 of Title VI, notice of the proposed action was published on August 15, 2012, in Volume 46, Number 34, of the Customs Bulletin. CBP did not receive any comments during the notice period. FACTS: In NY N039198, the articles were described as follows: [S]tyle[s] KM-0112 and 65025 have uppers of 51 percent…
962500 · 1999-06-16 — Ruling request for women’s slip-on shoe with rubber traction dots ; HQ 081588, dated July 11, 1988
This is in regard to your letter of December 17, 1998, requesting a prospective ruling on the classification of a women’s shoe. Your views expressed at a meeting on May 18, 1999 with staff are also considered in this response. FACTS: The shoe is a women’s pump with a leather upper, a wood heel with a plastic cap and a leather sole. The leather sole has 41 rubber dots inserted through holes in the leather. These dots range from one-fifth to one quarter of an inch in diameter. The footwear carries the model name of “Tammy” and is produced in Spain for Stuart Weitzman and Company. ISSUE: Are…
E80209 · 1999-04-26 — The tariff classification of footwear made in China.
. At issue is the tariff classification of an athletic shoe referred to as “Shark” with an upper of predominantly leather material and an outer sole of rubber or plastics. NY D88655 states in pertinent part: Although you state these are men’s shoes, there is no indication in your submission that you offer a comparable type of shoe for women. We consider this type of footwear to be commonly worn by both sexes. If you do not provide a women’s alternative to compliment the submitted men’s model, we consider the submitted sample to be “unisex’. Since this is the type of footwear which is commonly…
D89812 · 1999-04-20 — The tariff classification of footwear made in China.
Russ Holmgren of Circle International on your behalf. At issue is the tariff classification of an athletic shoe referred to as “One Niter” with an upper of predominantly leather material and an outer sole of rubber or plastics. Since this is the type of footwear which is commonly worn by both sexes, and no indication was provided that a comparable style was offered for women, the cited ruling indicated that the applicable subheading for “One Niter” in American men’s sizes 8.5 and larger will be 6403.99.60 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, (HTS), which provides for footwear with…
Not sure this code fits your product? HaiLang AI determines the US HTS code from a description in about a minute.
Classify a product