Footwear with outer soles of leather or composition leather:
H285612 · 2017-09-29 — Revocation of NY N276141; Classification of footwear from China
This letter is to inform you that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) has reconsidered New York Ruling Letter (“NY”) N276141, which was issued to Pro Line Manufacturing Company on June 29, 2016. In NY N276141, CBP classified a fishing wader with boots (“merchandise”) under subheading 6405.20.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), which provides for “[o]ther footwear: With uppers of textile materials: Other.” We have reviewed NY N276141 and found it to be incorrect. For the reasons set forth below, we are revoking this ruling. On August 16, 2017, pursuant to…
H023368 · 2008-11-25 — Reconsideration of NY N021852, dated January 23, 2008: classification of footwear
FACTS: The sample provided to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is identified as style number SH066-OL. The subject footwear was described in NY N021852 as follows: …a [women’s] size 6 low-top, lace-up basketball shoe with a foxing or foxing-like band, an outer sole of rubber/plastics and an upper of canvas textile material. The unit molded outer sole has a thin layer (approximately 1 mm) of leather material adhered by means of hot, fluid pressure to the walking surface at the ball and heel of the foot. In NY N021852, the subject merchandise was classified in subheading 6404.20.6060 HTSUS,…
962262 · 2001-11-19 — Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2809-98-100590, filed August 25, 1998, concerning the classification of women’s shoes.
This is a decision on a protest timely filed on August 25, 1998, against your decision in the classification and liquidation of women’s footwear entered in November 1997 and liquidated in May 1998. FACTS: You classified the merchandise under subheading 6404.20.60, HTSUSA, the provision for “Footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of textile materials: Footwear with outer soles of leather or composition leather: Other,” with an applicable duty rate of 37.5 percent ad valorem. The protestant claims that the goods should be classified in…
958608 · 2000-02-16 — Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1001-94-106827, filed October 5, 1994, concerning the classification of women’s shoes
This is a decision on a protest timely filed on October 5, 1994, against your decision in the classification and liquidation of women’s footwear entered in January 1994. The protest and Application for Further Review (AFR) were denied by your office on October 6, 1995. On December 19, 1995, this office approved a request to set aside the denial of AFR in accordance with the provisions of 19 U.S.C. § 1515(c). FACTS: You classified the merchandise under subheading 6404.20.60, HTSUSA, the provision for “Footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of…
958987 · 2000-02-16 — Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1001-95-108151, filed September 22, 1995, concerning the classification of women’s shoes
This is a decision on a protest timely filed on September 22, 1995, against your decision in the classification and liquidation of women’s footwear entered in June 1994. The protest and Application for Further Review (AFR) were denied by your office on November 17, 1995, on the basis that the “lead” AFR of Protest No. 1001-94-106827, involving essentially the same merchandise and issues, had been denied on October 6, 1995. On February 14, 1996, this office approved a request to set aside the denial of this AFR in accordance with the provisions of 19 U.S.C. § 1515(c). FACTS: You classified the…
Not sure this code fits your product? HaiLang AI determines the US HTS code from a description in about a minute.
Classify a product