Safety headgear:
Part of: 6506 — Other headgear, whether or not lined or trimmed:
H135337 · 2011-05-20 — Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2704-10-101788; welding face mask
2704-10-101788, filed on behalf of Save Phace, Inc. (hereinafter “Protestant“). At issue is the tariff classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) of a welding face mask. FACTS: The merchandise in question is a welding face mask made of plastic. In its imported condition, it lacks its crown bracket and darkening lens. The crown bracket is used to secure the mask to a wearer’s head. There is a cut out for the lens, and holes on either side of the mask for attaching the crown bracket, which encircles the crown of the head. The article, as imported, covers…
967820 · 2006-06-16 — Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3901-05-100564; Classification of welding helmets
This ruling is in response to an Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3901-05-100564 filed by McDermott Will & Emery LLP, on behalf of Miller Electric Manufacturing Company, concerning the classification of welding helmets under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has reviewed marketing and promotional literature with pictures of the subject merchandise. FACTS: The subject merchandise consists of welding helmets constructed of a heat resistant multi-layered shell of injection molded polyamide nylon and coated…
967593 · 2005-08-05 — Internal Advice Request No. 05/006; Classification of unassembled safety welding helmets from Sweden. Dear Port Director: This ruling is in response to a request for Internal Advice initiated by KMZ Rosenman, on behalf of their client, 3M Corporation. At issue is the proper classification of unassembled safety welding helmets. The request for Internal Advice is predicated on a Notice of Action issued by you on the imported unassembled welding helmets. The Notice of Action proposed that the
This ruling is in response to a request for Internal Advice initiated by KMZ Rosenman, on behalf of their client, 3M Corporation. At issue is the proper classification of unassembled safety welding helmets. The request for Internal Advice is predicated on a Notice of Action issued by you on the imported unassembled welding helmets. The Notice of Action proposed that the unassembled welding helmets with LCD auto-darkening lenses be classified in subheading 9013.80.9000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) and that helmets without the LCD auto-darkening…
f81868 · 2000-02-08 — The tariff classification of a safety cap from China.
, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted sample is a “bump cap” consisting of a plastic cap covered with a 65% polyester/35% cotton fabric. The cap is baseball-style with a visor, four ventilation holes in the crown and means for size adjustment in the rear. The plastic is not reinforced or laminated. You state that the “bump cap” is designed to protect a worker from bumps and abrasions to the head while working in a confined area, such as plumbers working in an industrial area or persons repairing large machinery. These workers do not need a traditional hardhat, which is…
083434 · 1989-12-04 — Water Polo Cap
A sample was submitted with your request. FACTS: The article in question is a water polo cap imported from Taiwan. The cap is made from nylon knit fabric and has plastic protectors which cover the ears. Two long chin ties which are an extension of the binding on the cap's edge serve to secure the cap on the wearer's head. ISSUE: Is the water polo cap sports equipment of chapter 95, HTSUSA, or headgear of headings 6505 or 6506, HTSUSA? LAW AND ANALYSIS: The General Rules of Interpretation (GRIs) govern classification under the HTSUSA. GRI 1 provides that the classification of articles is to be…
Not sure this code fits your product? HaiLang AI determines the US HTS code from a description in about a minute.
Classify a product