Of fused quartz or other fused silica
Part of: 700220 — Rods:
W968361 · 2008-07-14 — Domestic Interested Party Petition, 19 U.S.C. § 1516; Tariff Classification of Glass Preforms for Optical Fibers; HQ Ruling 967058 dated April 21, 2006
S.C. § 1516). At issue is whether CBP has correctly classified imported merchandise of “the class or kind” termed “glass preforms for optical fibers.” 19 C.F.R. § 175.0. The petitioner states that it is a manufacturer in the United States of merchandise of the same “class or kind,” and such qualification is a necessary prerequisite to file this petition. 19 C.F.R. § 175.2(a). The petitioner specifically challenges HQ 967058, dated April 21, 2006, an administrative ruling wherein CBP classified certain imported glass preforms for optical fibers in subheading 7002.20.1000 of the Harmonized…
W967058 · 2006-04-21 — Glass preforms used to create optical fibers; HQ 960948 revoked
This is in reference to Headquarters Ruling Letter ("HQ") 960948 issued to you on September 11, 1998, behalf of Lucent Technologies, Inc., regarding the classification of certain glass preforms under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated ("HTSUSA"). We have taken the opportunity to revisit the decision made in HQ 960948, as well as the rationale of that decision, and have determined that the conclusions reached therein are incorrect. This letter sets forth the correct classification of the glass preforms. Pursuant to section 625(c), Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1625…
W967059 · 2006-04-21 — Glass rod used to create optical fibers; HQ 964879 modified
This is in reference to Headquarters Ruling Letter ("HQ") 964879, issued to you March 21, 2002, on behalf of Corning, Inc., regarding the tariff classification of certain glass rod under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated ("HTSUSA"). We have reconsidered the rationale employed to reach the determination in HQ 964879. While this letter does not affect the classification in HQ 964879, it clarifies the factual predicates and sets forth the proper rationale for the classification decision made therein. Pursuant to section 625(c), Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1625…
960948 · 1998-09-11 — NY B85983 revoked; glass rods; unworked; other articles of glass; optical fiber; preforms; incomplete or unfinished; essential character; Note 2(a), Chapter 70; GRI 2(a); ENs Rule 2(a)(II); 70.02; 90.01; Blakley Corp. v. United States; Ugg International, Inc. v. United States; Winter-Wolff, Inc., v. United States; Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. v. United States; Superior Wire v. United States
On June 18, 1997, New York Ruling Letter (NY) B85983 was issued to you concerning "glass preforms" made from fused silica. You were advised that the merchandise was classifiable in subheading 7002.20.1000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), as glass rods, unworked, of fused quartz or other fused silica. This letter is to inform you that NY B85983 no longer reflects the view of Customs. Pursuant to section 625(c)(1), Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1625(c)(1)), as amended by section 623 of Title VI (Customs Modernization) of the North American Free Trade Agreement…
b85983 · 1997-06-18 — The tariff classification of glass fused silica rods from Japan
You indicated in your letter that "glass preforms" are solid glass rods made from fused silica. There is no grinding or shaping of the rod. The finished rod is approximately 62 mm in diameter and 1500 mm in length. You stated that the glass preform is the rod from which glass optical fiber will be fabricated. The rod will be used as an intermediate product in the process of optical fiber manufacture. The applicable subheading for the glass fused silica rods will be 7002.20.1000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for glass in balls (other than microspheres…
Not sure this code fits your product? HaiLang AI determines the US HTS code from a description in about a minute.
Classify a product