Not machined, not tooled and not otherwise processed after forging
Part of: 73079330 — With an inside diameter of less than 360 mm: — Of iron or nonalloy steel
H290374 · 2021-06-08 — Request to reconsider CBP ruling HQ H277699 (March 6, 2017); Classification of a Butt Welding Pivot Elbow
The facts of HQ H277699 were, in relevant part, as follows: The pivot elbow is part of a hydrostatic pivot irrigation system used in agricultural applications. The interior diameter measures approximately 8 inches and weighs approximately 25 pounds. See Fig. A. The pivot elbow attaches from a main water tower perpendicularly to an elevated irrigation arm, which are elevated by wheeled towers which permit the apparatus to be moved. The elevated pipeline arm pivots around the main water tower as water is pumped through the main water tower into the elevated irrigation arm which sprays water…
H277699 · 2017-03-06 —
HQ H277699 March 6, 2017 CLA-2 OT:RR:CTF:TCM H277699 PTM CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO: 7307.93.30 Oscar Gonzalez GRNR Attorneys LLC Park Place Center, 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75219 Dear Mr. Gonzalez, This is in response to your correspondence, dated April 29, 2016, requesting a binding ruling on behalf of your client, GT Midwest. The ruling request concerns the tariff classification on the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) of a pivot elbow. In reaching our determination, we have considered your supplemental submission dated February 8, 2017,…
H077356 · 2010-08-25 — Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3901-09-100896; Classification of certain unfinished forged carbon butt welding steel pipe fittings.
HQ H077356 August 25, 2010 CLA-2 OT:RR:CTF:TCM H077356 DAC CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NOS.: 7307.93.30, 7303.93.90 Port Director Port of Chicago U.S. Customs and Border Protection 9915 Bryn Mawr Ave. Rosemont, IL 60018 RE: Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3901-09-100896; Classification of certain unfinished forged carbon butt welding steel pipe fittings. Dear Port Director, This is our decision regarding the Application for Further Review (AFR) of Protest No. 3901-09-100896, filed June 18, 2009, on behalf of protestant, Bentrade, Inc. (“Bentrade”), against U.S. Customs and…
Not sure this code fits your product? HaiLang AI determines the US HTS code from a description in about a minute.
Classify a product