Articles imported from a designated beneficiary sub-Saharan African country enumerated in U.S. note 1 to this subchapter: — Apparel articles wholly assembled in one or more such countries (except the Republic of Rwanda) from fabric wholly formed in one or more such countries from yarn originating in either the United States or one or more such countries (including fabrics not formed from yarns, if such fabrics are classifiable under heading 5602 or 5603 and are wholly formed and cut in one or more such countries), or from components knit-to-shape in one or more such countries from yarns originating in the United States or one or more such countries or former beneficiary sub-Saharan African countries (as defined in U.S. note 3(d) to this subchapter), or both, or apparel articles wholly formed on seamless knitting machines in such a country from yarns originating in the United States or one or more such countries or former beneficiary sub-Saharan African countries (as defined in U.S. note 3(d) to this subchapter), or both, whether or not the apparel articles are also made from any of the fabrics, fabric components formed, or components knit-to-shape described in U.S. note 2(e) to this subchapter (unless the apparel articles are made exclusively from any of the fabrics, fabric components formed, or components knit-to-shape described in such U.S. note 2(e)), subject to the provisions of U.S. note 2 to this subchapter
Part of: 98 — Special classification provisions (US)
967595 · 2005-02-14 — African Growth and Opportunity Act; AGOA Acceleration Act of 2004; Women's Woven Pants; Waistband Curtain; Waistband; South Africa; Unfinished Component; Findings, Trimmings; Belt; Revocation of HQ 967333 and HQ 967350; Corrected Facts Dear Mr. Bodek: This is in response to your letter dated February 1, 2005, requesting that we issue revisions to Headquarters Rulings 967333 and 967350, dated December 20, 2004, to reflect corrected facts you now provide. In HQ 967333 and HQ 967350, women's pa
In HQ 967333 and HQ 967350, women's pants manufactured in South Africa containing fusing material which you advised were manufactured in Italy were determined not to meet the production requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C. 3721(b)(3) of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). The fusing material was found to disqualify the pants from duty-free treatment. You advise that the information you provided was incorrect. The factory misunderstood the inquiry and provided information regarding the curtain waistband not the fusing attached to the outer waistband. You now advise that the fusing…
967333 · 2004-12-20 — African Growth and Opportunity Act; AGOA Acceleration Act of 2004; Women's Woven Pants; Waistband Curtain; Waistband; South Africa; Unfinished Component; Findings, Trimmings Dear Mr. Bodek: This is in response to your letter dated August 12, 2004, requesting a binding ruling on the eligibility of women's pants manufactured in South Africa for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). FACTS: You have submitted samples of two pairs of women's pants. Both sty
FACTS: You have submitted samples of two pairs of women's pants. Both styles are constructed of 63 percent polyester, 33 percent rayon, and 4 percent spandex woven fabric. Style P96-8172 is fully lined and features a side zipper opening. Style P96-1315 features a front zipper opening with two-button closure, belt loops, and two sewn in pockets You advise that the garments will undergo the same manufacturing process as described below. Body fabric: Yarn made in South Africa Fabric woven in South Africa Hanger loops: Yarn made in South Africa Fabric woven in South Africa Pocketing, linings,…
967350 · 2004-12-20 — African Growth and Opportunity Act; AGOA Acceleration Act of 2004; Women's Woven Pants; Waistband Curtain; Waistband; South Africa; Unfinished Component; Findings, Trimmings; Belt Dear Mr. Bodek: This is in response to your letter dated September 20, 2004, requesting a binding ruling on the eligibility of women's pants manufactured in South Africa for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). FACTS: You have submitted a sample of a pair of women's pants, st
FACTS: You have submitted a sample of a pair of women's pants, style P96-1315 Gap. The body is constructed of 63 percent polyester, 33 percent rayon, and 4 percent spandex woven fabric. Style P96-1315 is fully lined and has a front zipper opening with two-button closure, belt loops, and two sewn in pockets. It features a sash belt constructed of 100% silk. You advise that the garment will undergo the same manufacturing process as described below. Body fabric: Yarn made in South Africa Fabric woven in South Africa Hanger loops: Yarn made in South Africa Fabric woven in South Africa Pocketing,…
K89038 · 2004-09-02 — African Growth and Opportunity Act; women’s wool ponchos; subheading 9819.11.09; U.S. Note 2, Subchapter XIX, Chapter 98; subheading 9819.11.27; U.S. Note 4, Subchapter XIX, Chapter 98
, requesting a binding ruling on the eligibility of certain women’s ponchos for duty-free treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (“AGOA”). FACTS: Ruby Ewe, Inc. plans to import from South Africa women’s knit ponchos classified in subheading 6102.10.0000, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). In South Africa, the wool yarn is spun, the fabric is knit from this yarn, and the garments are cut and sewn. The garments will be imported through the port of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. ISSUE: Whether the apparel, manufactured as described above, is eligible for…
562759 · 2003-09-30 — Protest No. 4601-02-102655; African Growth and Opportunity Act; Knit-to-shape articles
This is a decision on the Protest and Application for Further Review (“AFR”) filed by counsel on behalf of USI Sportswear against the Port’s decision to deny African Growth and Opportunity Act (“AGOA”) preferential tariff treatment for certain knit-to-shape articles from Mauritius and Madagascar. The protest was filed with the Port on July 31, 2002, with regard to entry Nos. XXX-XXXXXX9-5 dated May 15, 2001, XXX-XXXXXX1-4 dated June 20, 2001, and XXX-XXXXXX0-7 dated August 8, 2001. The decision to deny AGOA preferential treatment was based on the port’s finding that the knit-to-shape apparel…
Not sure this code fits your product? HaiLang AI determines the US HTS code from a description in about a minute.
Classify a product